| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
61. Zkill guide to Running for CSM 12 by rhiload - in CSM Campaigns [original thread]
I have no problem with someone like Suitonia effectively explaining deficiencies in ship balancing, on a CSM that also might include Rhiload, explaining what features need improving to help EVE reach the broadest possible audience. Or the both of ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.02.08 23:38:12
|
62. Where did the fun go? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: I strongly disagree with statement that devs posting on other social medias is helping gather new players. Game balancing / new features introducing will be incomprehensible for non-eve players. While the second stateme...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.02.08 22:10:31
|
63. Where did the fun go? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
One of the better values here is the "dev posts" roll-up. Does such a thing exist in Reddit? or has someone made a site I could bookmark that conglomerates all known ccp user posts on Reddit ?
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.02.07 23:02:14
|
64. Sticky:Dev Blog: Applications for CSM 12 are now open - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
http://csm.eveonline.com/ (CSM News) could use some love.
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.02.04 20:34:25
|
65. Nullification and Interdiction - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Perma-bubbles make gate lock-downs or camps too easy. Anchored bubbles should expire. They should be reworked to use the "new deployables" mechanic of dragging from cargo and dropping into space. Tech 1 could become fully disposable / ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.02.01 17:21:50
|
66. Sticky:CSM 11 Summit 2 Schedule - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Drilling platforms: disruption mechanics should be in the plan from the start. POS Siphons were a great idea allowing small groups to harass passive income of larger groups, and were supposed to require regular patrols by pilots-in-space, to disco...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.27 22:12:46
|
67. Sticky:Questions for CSM 11 Live stream (Jan 29) - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Looking forward to any news of progress in the overhaul of the NPC mission system. Planetary Interaction is a description of game mechanics, Planetary Industry is much better as a name for the feature. CCP, please consider adopting this altern...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.26 22:53:10
|
68. Announcement:119.1 - General discussion (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Dates on special edition assets : We're seeing more attention paid to putting dates on certain assets; please keep this up and come up with a uniform convention for inserting origination dates into older assets. Who can remember which event such-...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.21 23:26:43
|
69. Announcement:119.1 - Issues Thread (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Holiday_impact_Amarr1.red +12 others not-user-friendly internal code names exposed for future Special Edition Festival Assets
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.21 23:16:51
|
70. Omega status Player Produced Ship SKINs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mr Mieyli wrote: ... I understand the vision of a grim dark eve, but people like pretty colours too, and I wonder if there would be any revenue in it? I'm sure there is. Try to compare the values and interest in this ultimate contrast: the Ama...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.20 20:51:23
|
71. Omega status Player Produced Ship SKINs - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
CCP has made SKINs available in many different ways, but want some to be "aspirational goals", not give-aways. A limited variety do drop in-game, some are time-limited. There's certainly room for player built SKIN's in the future, but that doesn't...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.20 18:57:00
|
72. Eve mail archival? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think its 1500 total mails, and then the old ones get pushed off the bottom of the stack by new ones. The oldest mail I currently have saved is 2013, and I does make me sad that CCP can't store more compressible text on behalf of players. ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2017.01.12 08:25:23
|
73. [Feedback Request] Custom probe formation in the scanning system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Claymore wrote: But when you are setting up initially, how would you do it? Through the probes in the scanner window, or in the system map? Just a point of personal feedback on the UI in question: I see the scanner window as a list of info...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.16 19:25:47
|
74. Sticky:Dev Blog: Keepstar Destroyed in M-OEE8 in the Largest Battle in ... - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Fanfin Malukker wrote: Being a Dev Blog, I was hoping for some details about the backend/servers related to this event.... Some of this; a technical follow up would be neat, highlighting the new infrastructure TQ runs on, compared to the best ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.15 23:45:47
|
75. [Feedback Request] Custom probe formation in the scanning system - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
It was stated in the dev blog announcing probe formations , that the default formations were good, but not the most optimal configurations. A typical game design decision leaving room for player skill. That inevitably lead to min/max players expe...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.15 18:23:38
|
76. Announcement:118.10 - General discussion (PC) - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Rivr Luzade wrote: One thing regarding Citadel in-space sensor brackets: Inaccessible citadels should not lose their blue sensor overlay brackets. Scanned signatures and anomalies or landmarks do not either, therefore Citadels should also keep ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.14 15:57:38
|
77. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Retar Aveymone wrote: Either way, someone will notice if they look for it, and won't notice if they don't. Since it doesn't show up on your overview we are talking a very minor difference in the effort you need to put in to find it. I think t...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.08 19:35:50
|
78. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Retar Aveymone wrote: a control tower emails its location to the sov owner as soon as you anchor it, and the guns on a pos might as well not exist for all the good they do in any actual combat That's cool for sov owners, but outside of Sov it ...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.08 18:57:38
|
79. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Feature parity: a few items. A control tower does not broadcast its presence in a solar system with an in-space icon visible to all players. When jumping into a new system, without needing to click d-scan, we can look in space for blue icons, and...
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.08 17:29:58
|
80. Sticky:[December] Ending the deployment of new outposts and upgrades - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Fozzie, while you are removing some obsolete gear, can you take a look at SBU's ? The NPC buy orders have run their course. I think you once proposed to convert all existing SBU's and their BPO's into TCU's.
- by Circumstantial Evidence - at 2016.12.07 18:41:42
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |